Still no decision on A400M

No agreement has yet been reached on how to tackle the cost over-run of the A400M.

Gary Parsons - 5-Feb-2010


Airbus Military image

February 5: Despite Airbus Military’s deadline of the end of January passing, no agreement has yet been reached on how to tackle the cost over-run of the A400M transport aircraft programme.

It was hoped that a solution could be found this week at the informal meeting of NATO Defence Ministers in Istanbul, Turkey where Afghanistan is the main topic on the agenda. On the sidelines, personnel from Airbus parent company EADS are meeting with ministers from the seven partner nations in the programme - Germany, France, Spain, Britain, Belgium, Luxembourg and Turkey – to see if the €6.4 billion funding gap can be closed.

News agency AFP reports that the French Defence Minister, Herve Morin, is urging the other partners to find an extra €1.5 billion on top of the €2 billion already tentatively agreed, but still leaving a €2.9 billion shortfall for EADS to find. "I have the Prime Minister's agreement for France to extend a refundable advance of €400 million," he told reporters. "That will take us to between €1 to €1.5 billion if other countries follow suit."

In a twist, Morin also said the partners have called on Airbus Military to "honour its responsibilities and respect the obligations it has made" and set EADS a three-week deadline to agree the deal, saying that the agreement could be sealed at the next meeting of European Union defence ministers at the end of February.

Meanwhile work has started on the fourth aircraft at the plant in Seville, indicating Airbus Military is still proceeding with the programme at full speed.

Filed Under Military Aviation News.

Interested in Military Aviation?

3 Comments

chris nunn said on the 6-Feb-2010 at 14:52

its just an updated belfast
very late and very over budget
hope the raf gets more c17's

Michael Leek said on the 7-Feb-2010 at 15:40

More C-17s wouldn't fill the need for a replacement for the Hercules C-130Js. If anything the RAF needs more A400M, or an equivalent, than more C-17s.

mike lynn said on the 17-Feb-2010 at 11:32

Does it make sense to introduce yet another new type with all the assoiciated problems (espeacially the new engines)etc?
How many extra C130,s C-17,s with all the support and spares in place could we have instead of the A400m ?

Your Thoughts






key.Aero reserve the right to edit or remove inappropriate comments


 
  • Sqn Ldr Paula Willmot, MCO RAF Cottesmore, reports on Joint Force Harrier's biggest deployment since Afghanistan.
  • Feature Highlight  

Competition
WIN five aviation DVDs!
 
CLICK HERE

Most Read News...

Past Day

Past Week

Most Talked About News...