Read the forum code of contact
By: 6th July 2010 at 02:11 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-:( So so sad.
By: 6th July 2010 at 08:46 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The parents leave seven children.:(
By: 6th July 2010 at 13:03 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The parents leave seven children.:(
Er, which ones?
Folgers (wife 59) have 7 "children", but considering that they have 19 grandchildren and one great-granchild, which if any "child" of Folgers are children? Whereas the nurses were women of 42 and 49, and pilot a man of 59. How many children did they leave behind between them?
By: 6th July 2010 at 15:13 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Sounds like a quiz question? Unless I'm having a dumb day, I presume you are inferring that the 'children' are adults and therefore shouldn't be classified as children. Still makes them the children of the deceased doesn't it and therefore probably the most emotionally affected. :confused:
By: 6th July 2010 at 17:06 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Sounds like a quiz question? Unless I'm having a dumb day, I presume you are inferring that the 'children' are adults and therefore shouldn't be classified as children. Still makes them the children of the deceased doesn't it and therefore probably the most emotionally affected. :confused:
Children of the two deceased being the patient and her husband, as turns out from the link. But there is no mention of the children of the other three deceased, nor is it specifically mentioned that these deceased did not have children. Saying "the parents left seven children" would imply that seven is the total number of children of all five deceased...
By: Anonymous (not verified) - 5th July 2010 at 16:03 - Edited 10th April 2020 at 19:45
Another accident! :(
Yahoo news
This could be another case of, "was the flight really necessary?".