Antonov down

Member for

19 years 10 months

Posts: 2,886

Seems to have 'slipped under the radar' http://www.thestar.co.za/plane-crashes-into-homes-19-dead-1.1045449 Looks more like an An12 to me.:( RIP alcon.
Original post

Member for

19 years 10 months

Posts: 2,886

That is one hell of a clip:( A very sad end indeed.
Profile picture for user 27vet

Member for

9 years 11 months

Posts: 2,657

Definitely an An12. I know the company well. I have nothing good to say about them, so I won't say anything. RIP to the poor victims. PS If any aspiring young pilot is ever tempted to work there, pm me first.
Profile picture for user Gingie

Member for

12 years

Posts: 110

Status: Preliminary Date: 21 MAR 2011 Time: 15:30 Type: Antonov 12BP Operator: Trans Air Congo Registration: TN-AGK ? C/n / msn: 402006 First flight: 1963 Crew: Fatalities: 4 / Occupants: 4 Passengers: Fatalities: 5 / Occupants: 5 Total: Fatalities: 9 / Occupants: 9 Ground casualties: Fatalities: 14 Airplane damage: Written off Airplane fate: Written off (damaged beyond repair) Location: near Pointe Noire Airport (PNR) (Congo) show on map Phase: Approach (APR) Nature: Cargo Departure airport: Brazzaville-Maya Maya Airport (BZV) (BZV/FCBB), Congo Destination airport: Pointe Noire Airport (PNR) (PNR/FCPP), Congo Narrative: An Antonov 12 cargo plane was destroyed when it crashed in the Mvoumvou residential area of Pointe-Noire, Congo. The airplane was approaching runway 17 when it came down. It struck several houses and burst into flames. AFP quoted a local official who reported that there were four crew members and five passengers on the plane. A spokesman of the Russian embassy in Brazzaville reported that three crew members were Russians. The copilot was a citizen of Kazakhstan. Trans Air Congo supposedly owns one An-12 plane, registered TN-AGK.

Member for

13 years 9 months

Posts: 2,812

First flight: 1963
For a Soviet built aircraft that would make it absolutely prehistoric - they probably found it in a scrapyard and pulled it out with a bulldozer...
Profile picture for user Bmused55

Member for

16 years 1 month

Posts: 10,625

The video in that first AV Herald article is absolutely chilling! Looks like a text book aerodynamic roll over. No 3 + 4 engines out, No 1 + 2 on full power. Left wing has more lift, hence the right hand roll. Too slow, and too low to do anything about it. RIP :( Some say the An12 cannot be landed with two engines out on one side. The gear and flaps make it nigh on impossible to control in that situation.

Member for

13 years 9 months

Posts: 2,812

Some say the An12 cannot be landed with two engines out on one side. The gear and flaps make it nigh on impossible to control in that situation.
And the C-130, ever have this problem?
Profile picture for user 27vet

Member for

9 years 11 months

Posts: 2,657

Sandy, you could be right on that score. #3 appeared feathered, but #4 didn't appear so, which would have made things worse. With the Antonov's small fin, control would have been almost impossible.

Member for

13 years 5 months

Posts: 168

:O its not very of often if at all you see the last moment of an aircraft before a crash, and that video just shocked the hell out of me, the speed to rolled over and dived was seconds.
Profile picture for user Deskpilot

Member for

10 years 6 months

Posts: 519

:O its not very of often if at all you see the last moment of an aircraft before a crash, and that video just shocked the hell out of me, the speed to rolled over and dived was seconds.
When at low level and going down, the instinct is to pull the stick bank.....not good when inverted. What gets me is that the plane touched down right side up going by the virtually complete tail and cockpit shots.
Profile picture for user Bmused55

Member for

16 years 1 month

Posts: 10,625

virtually complete cockpit? where? I see only fragments of wing and a the complete tail
Profile picture for user Deskpilot

Member for

10 years 6 months

Posts: 519

My error
virtually complete cockpit? where? I see only fragments of wing and a the complete tail
Yes you're right. I looked at several youtube clips and got that one mixed in. Sorry. Still, how the hell did the tail section end up virtually undamaged?
Profile picture for user Bmused55

Member for

16 years 1 month

Posts: 10,625

Judging by the angle the video shows the plane plummeting at, I'd hedge a bet on the forward fuselage taking most of the impact and the inertia whipping the tail round into the position you see it in.