To be able to purchase on the shop necessary cookies needs to be enabled, please see our
Cookie Policy
for more detail.
Cookies are required as well to watch videos.
If you prefer not to allow cookies please call
+44 (0) 1780 480404
to place your order over the phone.
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 23rd April 2012 at 16:12 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
The amount of ammo would also back up the getting lost and running out of fuel theory.
Posts: 10,165
By: Peter - 23rd April 2012 at 16:21 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Not sure about the running out of gas thoery.. looks like fire damage on the cowling to me..?
Posts: 554
By: Beaufighter VI - 23rd April 2012 at 16:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Each time you look at the video you see more. Note flak holes visible inside the fuselage stbd. side, port tailplane one hole, top rear fuselage damage and of course the exit holes by the hatch port side.
Posts: 10,029
By: Mark12 - 23rd April 2012 at 17:02 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
We know where it came from. We know what it was doing. We know where it was found. Why would it be there, miles from the the operational coastal area?
Not totally lost and out of fuel then?
Mark
By: Anonymous - 23rd April 2012 at 17:17 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Why?? :confused:
Posts: 485
By: Jayce - 23rd April 2012 at 17:48 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Could'a been lost, could'a been a standing patrol looking for enemy movements way out there, Could'a been a pursuit.... we could speculate all year. Lets wait for the serial to become known and see what the ORB tells us.
Posts: 8,976
By: TonyT - 23rd April 2012 at 18:32 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
The only thing that is 100% sure is we have never ever left one up there, they all come back to earth eventually....The rest is just conjecture.
As for ammo, a lot of the cold war bombs the ruskies used were simply surplus WW2 shells with fins added.
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 23rd April 2012 at 18:58 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
In which case he might not have bumped into any bad guys and therefore didn't expend any ammo on this sortie, as opposed to being shot down in a combat scenario. Just a thought.
Posts: 429
By: danjama - 23rd April 2012 at 21:21 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
We are in trouble. It's been posted on imgur gallery. This is now public knowledge.
p.s. dont read the comments, they will damage your IQ.
http://imgur.com/gallery/rF52T
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 23rd April 2012 at 22:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
'As someone who appreciates random ****, Not bad.'
High brow stuff! IQ irreparably damaged...
Posts: 2,605
By: QldSpitty - 24th April 2012 at 09:01 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Lady be good?Or a new one?
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/28506388
Posts: 10,029
By: Mark12 - 24th April 2012 at 09:14 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
LBG.
Mark
Posts: 1,026
By: Banupa - 24th April 2012 at 09:29 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
In my youth, around 1960, my cousin and I used to plane spot at Biggin Hill. To avoid ejection by grown ups, we used to sneak through the woods to get to the hangar at the far side. During one sortie, I nearly trod on something that looked like a shell or mortar :eek:. I retreated and careful circumnavigated the item, taking great care no to tread on any others there. I wonder if they still lay in the woods there?
Posts: 282
By: shepsair - 24th April 2012 at 13:39 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
P40
Bit more by someone there
The Egyptian government have been informed by the military. The army took only ammunition of the airplane to not hit the wrong hands. At the moment the plane is in the same state as in the movie. there is practically no possibility of the devastation of this plane because it is army complex - patrolled by the army.
The plane was found incidentally - do not do the explorations..
in mid-April, I'll try to go to the place where the plane - it will put more videos.
or now, I found this information:
AIRPLANE H87A-3
PART NO. 87-69-714R
CAL. 50, CAP.155 RDS
R.H. GUN BOX NO 2
I have a few pictures from the cockpit - I will try to end the week to include them on the internet - give them a link
regards
Mark
Posts: 2,598
By: paulmcmillan - 24th April 2012 at 14:18 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Well Buz was spot on H87-A3 = P-40E-1CU
So Serial will be one of either 420
RAF ET100 to ET519 USAAF 41-24776 to 41-25195 C/N 19287 to 19706
or one of either 1080
RAF ET520 to ET1030 (ET1000-> ET 1030 Manufacturers Error became EV100 to EV130) then EV100 to EV699
USAAF 41-35874 to 41-36953 C/N 19707 to 20786
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 24th April 2012 at 14:43 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Bingo!
https://picasaweb.google.com/114682566226043469349/Zdj_samolot?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCKjxkt6rkNTFKg&feat=directlink
Posts: 1,311
By: Dr Strangelove - 24th April 2012 at 14:46 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Can't open the link, Her Maj has blocked it, any clues :( :?
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 24th April 2012 at 14:50 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
It's in the youtube video you. Amazing photos!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFe8CsOdoG8
Posts: 442
By: Dobbins - 24th April 2012 at 14:52 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
There's plenty of flare cartridges on the ground, so maybe the pilot was able to be picked up...
Posts: 74
By: Timc63 - 24th April 2012 at 14:53 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Remarkable photographs, amazing how well preserved it is, let's hope it stays that way.