Read the forum code of contact
By: 11th October 2016 at 13:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Yeah, two weeks ago they hit an airfield nearby (the Netherlands). Two Rotax 912s, both relatively lowtime. Engine mounts, turbo, accessoiries, engine instruments and all. Lots of collatoral damage to the airframe in the process, very crude removal. They're not the first on the continental side of the Channel. Suspected to go to Eastern Europe into the MLA market over there. There's more and more airfields banning non-pilot visitors, to help prevent this kind of brazen theft.
By: 11th October 2016 at 14:06 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-There's more and more airfields banning non-pilot visitors, to help prevent this kind of brazen theft.
Which kind of defeats the object - I'm certainly not tarring with any particular brush but it does occur that some of those frequenting airfields in the course of their correct business could well be those doing the deed. And if not at first-hand then more than possibly as a source of good gen. Where else would one find reliable TBO/SMOH detail etc?
By: 11th October 2016 at 14:58 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-hi,
I did read a comment from a airfield manager after a recent theft "I hope he gets a good long sentence, and when he gets out I will offer him a job cause he removed the engine etc very professionally". There was also a case recently on the continent where 2 or 3 east Europeans were stopped and they had 6 engines all from Italy, do "spotters" in these other countries get blamed, or is it a English thingy?
regards,
jack...
this post may contain grammatical errors...
By: 11th October 2016 at 15:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Where else would one find reliable TBO/SMOH detail etc?
One aircraft involved was brandnew. No rocket science there to figure out low TBO time. The other was in the same hangar.
By: 11th October 2016 at 15:35 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-hi,
I did read a comment from a airfield manager after a recent theft "I hope he gets a good long sentence, and when he gets out I will offer him a job cause he removed the engine etc very professionally". There was also a case recently on the continent where 2 or 3 east Europeans were stopped and they had 6 engines all from Italy, do "spotters" in these other countries get blamed, or is it a English thingy?
Not the same thief as a case I saw recently then, where the aircraft suffered 8K euros worth of collatoral damage from a hacksaw being used to cut the motor mounts...
By: 11th October 2016 at 15:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-To be fair, discouraging visits from non-pilots seems to be just one measure. Less people on site means less info about the site being shared in the public domain. Same goes for a close look at the Facebook postings some owners make. "Hooray: aircraft X flying again after fitting a new zero-houred engine" does not help for a low-profile in the public domain.
By: 11th October 2016 at 16:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-hi,
I did read a comment from a airfield manager after a recent theft "I hope he gets a good long sentence, and when he gets out I will offer him a job cause he removed the engine etc very professionally". There was also a case recently on the continent where 2 or 3 east Europeans were stopped and they had 6 engines all from Italy, do "spotters" in these other countries get blamed, or is it a English thingy?regards,
jack...this post may contain grammatical errors...
Just too easy to blame spotters......
By: 11th October 2016 at 16:14 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-To be fair, discouraging visits from non-pilots seems to be just one measure. Less people on site means less info about the site being shared in the public domain. Same goes for a close look at the Facebook postings some owners make. "Hooray: aircraft X flying again after fitting a new zero-houred engine" does not help for a low-profile in the public domain.
The gist of my post above was that it's not beyond impossible that at least one pilot might be involved in said thefts: thus rather pointless excluding one group and pretending the problem has gone.
By: 11th October 2016 at 16:55 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Prune has a developing thread on this
http://www.pprune.org/private-flying/583257-rotax-912-engine-thefts-plane-spotters.html
My pilot had a brand new laptop stolen from his home and its likely that the thief knew which house to target as it is known that dodgy shop assistants sell lists of addresses to criminals . Plane spotters have little interest in engines and what hours they have.
By: 11th October 2016 at 18:13 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Is there available a reasonably sized tracking device with a sensible range that can be unobtrusively attached to the engine? I've operated a Rotax on a Group A for the last twelve or so years. Their use is not confined to microlites which tend to use the smaller two stroke Rotax's
There is probably more uptake of the Rotax for Group A than any other category. Many of these a/c are kept on fairly isolated farm strips. The opportunity for successful theft is therefore good.
By: 11th October 2016 at 22:04 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-It's not just engines.
A farmer friend from Kent recently visited my rural area and was shocked that farmers/ranchers leave equipment in the fields at night.
He said, if he did anything like that, they'd either steal or strip the tractor or at least drain the petrol.
Probably word got around the criminal community that the engines had a ready market on the continent...
I wouldn't buy any engine without supporting documents or logs, or do Rotax's not have any?
By: 11th October 2016 at 22:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Is there available a reasonably sized tracking device with a sensible range that can be unobtrusively attached to the engine?
http://www.studylifestyle.com/2016/trackr/10/?cid=12&utm_term=dailymail-row&sxid=ao8kriwck8jc
This is a new product which seems very promising, but I don't see any reference to the active range. I have no recommendation or connection with this product.
By: 12th October 2016 at 11:31 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Newforest,
Many thanks for that useful link. I've contacted, asking for average range details.
By: 12th October 2016 at 12:21 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I wouldn't buy any engine without supporting documents or logs, or do Rotax's not have any?
No doubt many of these thefts are to order and there are sophisticated operators managing these and fencing their results. I suspect that such sophisticated operators will not find it much of a challenge to produce convincing fake documentation for the engines as they re-emerge into the supply chain.
I must say that I'm amazed that a topic with no connection whatosever to aviation history has survived so long on this forum without being shifted to the GA forum!
By: 12th October 2016 at 12:59 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Perhaps the subject is so serious that it deserves the widest possible publicity.
By: 12th October 2016 at 14:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-It's not just engines.
A farmer friend from Kent recently visited my rural area and was shocked that farmers/ranchers leave equipment in the fields at night.
He said, if he did anything like that, they'd either steal or strip the tractor or at least drain the petrol.
Its Land Rover Defenders that is the target now
By: 12th October 2016 at 14:32 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-No doubt many of these thefts are to order and there are sophisticated operators managing these and fencing their results. I suspect that such sophisticated operators will not find it much of a challenge to produce convincing fake documentation for the engines as they re-emerge into the supply chain.
If documentation is being faked before entry into the supply chain, why the focus on low-time engines?
By: 12th October 2016 at 14:43 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-If the engines are low time there won't be that much of a paper trail regarding servicing and maintenance records that can, for example, be cross referenced, because the engines will have been thru' few hands.
By: 18th October 2016 at 09:39 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Ref post 13, I saw the same product but it was aimed at cycles:
Posts: 1,628
By: ozplane - 11th October 2016 at 09:59
I'm not sure if this is the right forum but here goes anyway.As you might have seen on various sites, there have been at least 20 thefts of Rotax 912 engines from aircraft in the last couple of months. This engine is just about the standard for most microlights and the new "plastic fantastic" so will find a ready market, probably elsewhere in Europe. So how does this affect us as enthusiasts? Well, I was at the Fly-In at Old Buckenham on Sunday and talking to a well known microlight strip owner he told me that he has already put up a sign saying "No Spotters" as he reckoned that the thieves were using our hobby as cover. These guys are very sophisticated in that they are only taking low time engines so obviously use all available sources of information for their targets. There is a thread running elsewhere on this forum seeking information on the whereabouts of a specific aircraft and although I'm sure it is done with the best intent I think we ought to be careful with what is put on here. I don't know the answer but it is a problem.