Chinese air power thread 18

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

9 years 4 months

Posts: 269

pattern looks Russian but the paint type looks a lot like this
http://www.f-16.net/g3/var/resizes/f-16-photos/album41/album40/aau.jpg?m=1370894664

rather than

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TvugnPu0vPk/UU3OnqvnhuI/AAAAAAAAvmM/ojxjCbrgEw8/s1600/2013_CF6_Paint_00392PR_1269967624_4482.jpg

the j-20 paint job is superior because it combines high level stealth paint and can combine it with camouflage
that f-35 has a lot of reflective painting schemes and even if it had none, has no camouflage pattern
the PAKFA is a normal glossy paint scheme favored by the Russian military because it looks nicer in air shows.

Member for

13 years 2 months

Posts: 1,299

lol what a flip flopper. first you agree with Mr. Chinabot's post doubting they were flare ejectors, and after a neutral person proved both of you wrong, then you switch your position lol.

? Err read my reply above #112, I did say there was possibility of them being flare ejectors, and I said I wasn't sure if they were flare ejectors. That's pretty different to Byoin or Spudman's posts saying like they definitely believed those topside things weren't or were flare ejectors.

The entire point of that post (of mine) was to flipflop and say "it might be or it might not be," so I suppose you're right in that regard.

reminds me a lot about the claims of the J-20 not being the same size as the Flanker until Quantum and a bunch of others showed that they were the same, using the same exact sattelite image the naysayers used

I'm not sure what you're referring to here, I might not have followed that discussion too closely. I consider the length discussion to have been settled a few years back.

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

I'm not sure what you're referring to here, I might not have followed that discussion too closely. I consider the length discussion to have been settled a few years back.

its like pakfa and the sducts, it will never be settled.
even the j-10s length is underdispute. tons of fanboys claiming it is the same as the f-16 like your friend above

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

ok Jo Asukura, I don't know why Russian posters keep coming here dismissing Chinese aircraft. A lot of Chinese and non-Chinese like Blitzo enjoy normal conversation and news here and we care about facts

the J-20 is only slightly longer than f-22. it just LOOKS longer because the f-22 has a huge reflective tail. If it had a smaller tail like the j-20, it would also Look long. for example

https://s13.postimg.org/s31w59o0n/f_22.jpg

the longest and largest aircraft are always Russian. the PAKFA is longer and bigger than the j-20 and the f-22. especially because of its tandem bays.

please leave my other account out of this, that one is just dedicated to talking about s-ducks.

and that is a horrible photoshop. no one here thinks the j-20 is as long as the f-22. well except you

Member for

13 years 2 months

Posts: 1,299

its like pakfa and the sducts, it will never be settled.
even the j-10s length is underdispute. tons of fanboys claiming it is the same as the f-16 like your friend above

Mhmm, okay then.

I'm not sure why J-10s length would be under dispute or why either side would be interested in disputing for or against it in the first place, but I suppose anything can happen here.

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

Mhmm, okay then.

I'm not sure why J-10s length would be under dispute or why either side would be interested in disputing for or against it in the first place, but I suppose anything can happen here.

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.

Member for

13 years 2 months

Posts: 1,299

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.

I think every crowd has their own triggers that can be abused or lionized.

The good thing about this forum is it brings together lots of people following various different military aviation nations to share info that they may not be able to see, but it also causes the opportunity for a lot of mutual trolling, and there are always a few people who seem to get a kick out of it.

Member for

14 years 11 months

Posts: 80

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.

I am no chinabot buy you are freaking 1st class idiot/troll.

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

I am no chinabot buy you are freaking 1st class idiot/troll.

why should I buy me?

Member for

9 years 4 months

Posts: 269

why should I buy me?

many contributors here speak english as a second language. its rude to pick out their spelling flaws. lets focus only on content

Member for

9 years 4 months

Posts: 269

please leave my other account out of this, that one is just dedicated to talking about s-ducks.

and that is a horrible photoshop. no one here thinks the j-20 is as long as the f-22. well except you

don't twist my words. I said it is a little bit longer than f-22
and yes j-10 is the same size as the f-16

Member for

9 years 9 months

Posts: 1,765

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.


For what I have seen 'Murica are ecqually peculiarly sensitive over some other topics, expecially when it come to their Technology is God mindset.
They usually think as an example that Air combat shift directly from close dogfight with guns (see F-16) to head on BVR engagement at hundreds of km distance (a la F-14/phoenix: 100% miss in US service) and generally they think that the only solution of any problem is to constantly pour heavy amount of new hi-tech gizmos, that would regularly get available just ten years from now...
Every one has its own sensibility to certain argunents : so as an another example, let's try to talk about European projects without citing my own nation also and you would receive a quite angry reply from my parts...

Member for

8 years

Posts: 1,168

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.

You are aware of the history of the term 3rd world ? Apparently not. There was the 2 superpowers USSR and USSA and then the 3rd world.

Member for

8 years

Posts: 1,168

ok Jo Asukura, I don't know why Russian posters keep coming here dismissing Chinese aircraft. A lot of Chinese and non-Chinese like Blitzo enjoy normal conversation and news here and we care about facts

the J-20 is only slightly longer than f-22. it just LOOKS longer because the f-22 has a huge reflective tail. If it had a smaller tail like the j-20, it would also Look long. for example

[img]https://s13.postimg.org/s31w59o0n/f_22/img]

the longest and largest aircraft are always Russian. the PAKFA is longer and bigger than the j-20 and the f-22. especially because of its tandem bays.

http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/5gside.jpg

Member for

15 years 5 months

Posts: 6,983

yeah, i agree it really shouldn't be that interesting to dispute.
but for some reason Chinabots like deino, foxmulder and byoin and Russia stronk like JSR and KGB bust a nut when their favorite aircraft is called out for being too long or too short, or too straight or too curved.

you don't see the America #1 or France est Grande crowd caring much about it. probably some 3rd world mentality about wanting to be close to western sizes.

there is a chinese saying that dates back all the way back to the legendary Drukpa Kunley: "the longer the merrier"

Attachments

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/5gside.jpg

very useful graphic! didn't realize the j-20 and mig 1.44 sizes were so similar.

do one for the 4th gen with the j-10, mig-29 and f-16

Member for

9 years 4 months

Posts: 269

http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/5gside.jpg

these are not properly scaled and comes from a brazilian website.
j-20 is closer to 20m, pakfa closer to 22

Member for

12 years 7 months

Posts: 4,731

don't twist my words. I said it is a little bit longer than f-22
and yes j-10 is the same size as the f-16

J-10 is not same size as F-16. There was pics of J-10 parked next to Rafale at Maks airshow.

Member for

15 years 3 months

Posts: 1,912

very useful graphic! didn't realize the j-20 and mig 1.44 sizes were so similar.

do one for the 4th gen with the j-10, mig-29 and f-16

Here is a rough comparison. Length is for J-10A. J-10B/C are lightly shorter from what I heard.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]249191[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]249192[/ATTACH]

Attachments

Member for

10 years 11 months

Posts: 2,040

Here is a rough comparison. Length is for J-10A. J-10B/C are lightly shorter from what I heard.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]249191[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]249192[/ATTACH]

great thanks. good work on finding all the accurate measurements on the j-10 and j-20.
always proving the bots wrong!