Read the forum code of contact
By: 23rd June 2005 at 11:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Its better, but not great. Too many grey colours for me on the site, looks a bit miserable (like Heathrow!). Only joking! ;)
Flex 35
By: 23rd June 2005 at 11:46 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I like the look, very fresh and crisp, but now runs EVEN slower than the old BAA website..!
By: 23rd June 2005 at 12:23 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I like it, looks better than the old site still not a fan of their layout of the page etc.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 14:36 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Nice, but a small mistake. Where it says 'How can we help?' the middle pic (A320 and 747) is actually of MAN.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 14:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Improvment to the old one. The old one deffo looked outdated and clumsy. This is better
By: 23rd June 2005 at 14:50 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Nice, but a small mistake. Where it says 'How can we help?' the middle pic (A320 and 747) is actually of MAN.
How can you possibly tell? (Not that it matters anyway!).
I love the new look, far better than the old one, which as others have said, was looking quite dated.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 14:59 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-How can you possibly tell? (Not that it matters anyway!).
Yeah?
Doesnt look like MAN personally!
By: 23rd June 2005 at 15:01 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Why would BAA want to use photos from Manchester anyway? They have seven of their own airports they can visit to get photographs.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 15:06 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Yeah?
Doesnt look like MAN personally!
Doesen't look like it to me either! Not that you would be able to tell anyway with such a small photo!
As Michael says, why would they use a photo from MAN? :confused:
By: 23rd June 2005 at 15:32 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-A nice layout, but like Flex not keen on the colours, although it does convey a very realistic feeling of Heathrow :D
By: 23rd June 2005 at 19:14 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Why on the EDI site are Fly Globepsan routes listed in the charter section
By: 23rd June 2005 at 19:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Why on the EDI site are Fly Globepsan routes listed in the charter section
Probably because Flyglobespan give you the option of a flight+hotel package, but you're right, they're not charter flights.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 19:25 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Probably because Flyglobespan give you the option of a flight+hotel package, but you're right, they're not charter flights.
Even bmi does this.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 20:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-FlyGlobespan do operate charter flights dont they? I know at least they operate Hurgada on behalf of MyTravel.
By: 23rd June 2005 at 20:24 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Nice, but a small mistake. Where it says 'How can we help?' the middle pic (A320 and 747) is actually of MAN.
I know what your getting at. There is a very similar photo spot at 24L @ Manchester, where you can get shots almost identical to that photo.
But, they look like two British Airways aircraft to me and they look like they are either holding for 27R or taxing to 27R @ LHR. You can tell this because the flaps are extended for takeoff.
Flex 35
By: 23rd June 2005 at 21:57 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-FlyGlobespan do operate charter flights dont they? I know at least they operate Hurgada on behalf of MyTravel.
Yes, that is a charter flight, as you can't book that one on Flyglobespan's website. The rest of their route network should be seen as scheduled flights though.
Posts: 6,503
By: T5 - 23rd June 2005 at 11:36
BAA has in the past day or two changed their quite nice blue and yellow websites to something a little more simple.
http://www.baa.co.uk/heathrow
What do you think?