Read the forum code of contact
By: 26th September 2005 at 20:58 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-6,102,080 pax in August - down 3%...sure you can guess my local lol...
By: 26th September 2005 at 20:58 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-2240611 pax, up 3.6% on last year.
By: 26th September 2005 at 21:00 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-823 922, up 6.6% on last August.
By: 26th September 2005 at 21:29 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-LEEDS BRADFORD INTERNATIONAL
282254 pax in August, which is up 17.6% on last year.
Can you beat that increase?? All because of Jet2.com Expansion and New routes by Air Southwest to Newquay & Bristol, And Flybe routes to Southampton & Exeter. Also not forgetting the swefly B767 Flights to Lahore which operated in August.
By: 26th September 2005 at 21:47 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Some really impresive increase in pax numbers there, as LBA says, LBA up 17.6 % which is good, but also Exeter up 36.3%, Blackpool 63.4!, Liverpool 33.9, and Bournemouth 100% compared to the same month last year.
By: 27th September 2005 at 06:50 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-SOU 197468 pax - up 18%
All due to increased fly-Be ops I think - my only slight concern is that fly-be are so dominant here that if anything were to happen then SOU would be left with very little scheduled traffic.
By: 27th September 2005 at 07:30 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-CWL 220596 +0.6% :) About the only thing that is new there is the weekly OOM flight to YYZ.
BRS 564023 +15.3% :D It's probably due to the CO EWR service and the numerous new easyJet routes.
By: 27th September 2005 at 09:13 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/80/airport_data_prov/200508/August_2005_Provisional_Airport_Statistics.pdfHow well has your local done?
HUY - 54268, down 16.3%
Not all bad though as Excel next year should reverse most, if not all of this years decrease
This is assuming they are correct...LOL. I was working on figures from July last week, and clsoed a table down, when I went back to it 10 minutes later the table had been removed. I rang the CAA and was informed they had got many of the destinations wrong. Shouldn't affect the overall numbers though!
By: 27th September 2005 at 09:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The BHX figures in that link seem to be different from the one's released from the BHX website.
By: 27th September 2005 at 18:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-This is assuming they are correct...LOL. I was working on figures from July last week, and clsoed a table down, when I went back to it 10 minutes later the table had been removed. I rang the CAA and was informed they had got many of the destinations wrong. Shouldn't affect the overall numbers though!
Funny you should say, the other statistics about routes recorded HUY-DLM/Bodrum and somewhere else as no passengers when they had at least 1 weekly flight
Posts: 1,887
By: Humberside - 26th September 2005 at 20:51
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/80/airport_data_prov/200508/August_2005_Provisional_Airport_Statistics.pdf
How well has your local done?
HUY - 54268, down 16.3%
Not all bad though as Excel next year should reverse most, if not all of this years decrease