Read the forum code of contact
By: 18th March 2006 at 22:23 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-According to Reuters only 6 were actually injured although 45 were taken to hospital as a precaution. It's a 737NG as well by the looks of it
By: 18th March 2006 at 22:26 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Well a 737-600 is a NG.
Sounds like pretty serious damage to the aircraft, glad to hear injuries were minimal :)
By: 18th March 2006 at 22:50 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Well a 737-600 is a NG.
Yes I felt a bit silly when I'd posted then read the thread title :rolleyes:
By: 19th March 2006 at 13:28 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Sounds like pretty serious damage to the aircraft, glad to hear injuries were minimal :)
Indeed. It always seems to be the evacuations that cause injuries though.
By: 19th March 2006 at 13:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Indeed. It always seems to be the evacuations that cause injuries though.
Sliding from a 737-600 must be pretty bad...but top deck A380!
By: 19th March 2006 at 14:43 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-but top deck A380!
let's hope it never happens for real :)
By: 19th March 2006 at 15:36 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Has that certification test occured yet? Rumours were that it was in March sometime.
By: 19th March 2006 at 18:32 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-If it has, then I'm sure the Airbus website will have news on it :)
By: 19th March 2006 at 20:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Here is a link to see a pic.
By: 19th March 2006 at 22:36 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Has that certification test occured yet? Rumours were that it was in March sometime.
They're waiting for favourable conditions :rolleyes:
I think they've even asked the CAA and FAA if they can conduct the tests indoors. "For participant safety". I'm sure it is merely a coincidence that the upper slides were blowing away in the slightest wind. ;) :diablo:
By: 20th March 2006 at 11:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The evacuation test shown on the 777 program 21st Century Jet was also done inside.
Participant safety is a valid reason as you do not want to put people at an unnecessary risk - they are all volunteers as well. A certain % would probably have done 1 or more slides previously so would know what to expect.
Did Boeing ever do a full evacuation on the 400 model using the upper deck slides as these would be of a similar height to the A380 top deck ones.
By: 20th March 2006 at 12:39 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Seen a few pics of this 736.
Seems like a pretty hard landing had forced the landing gear support beam (false spar) to punch through the wing a little. It has dislodged the trailing edge flaps and the gear now rests swept backwards.
By: 20th March 2006 at 13:45 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-They're waiting for favourable conditions :rolleyes:
I think they've even asked the CAA and FAA if they can conduct the tests indoors. "For participant safety". I'm sure it is merely a coincidence that the upper slides were blowing away in the slightest wind. ;) :diablo:
Just a valid thing: the evacuation is done "by night". So either wait for the night or use a hangar and switch off the light. No need to use " :rolleyes: " because this is common practise even with super-safe Boeing aircraft.
By: 20th March 2006 at 15:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Just a valid thing: the evacuation is done "by night". So either wait for the night or use a hangar and switch off the light. No need to use " :rolleyes: " because this is common practise even with super-safe Boeing aircraft.
Clearly I've hit a nerve.
The :rolleyes: were meant to convey my comment as tongue in cheek. Perhaps a ":p" would have been better.
By: 20th March 2006 at 16:15 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Clearly I've hit a nerve.
Yes, you did. Please understand that I go against claims if they have no validation and especially don't like if they are done "by-the-way". Feel free to do the same with my claims.
By: 20th March 2006 at 16:40 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Yes, you did. Please understand that I go against claims if they have no validation and especially don't like if they are done "by-the-way". Feel free to do the same with my claims.
It wasn't a claim per se. Just a tongue in cheek jibe.
I am fully aware how these tests are undertaken ;)
There is no need to be so oversensative though this is not Airliners.net :cool:
Posts: 741
By: Dantheman77 - 18th March 2006 at 22:11
source: www.jacdec.de (incl. pics)
<<
DATE: 18.03.2006
LOCAL TIME: ~ 10:25
LOCATION: Seville-Intl AP (LEZL)
COUNTRY: Spain
AIRLINE: Air Algerie
TYPE: Boeing 737-6D6
REGISTRATION: 7T-VJQ
C/N: 30209
AGE: 3 y + 11 m
OPERATION: INP
FLIGHT No.: -
FROM: Oran
TO: Seville
VIA:-
OCCUPANTS:
PAX: 101
CREW:x
FATALITIES:
PAX: 0
CREW: 0
OTHER: 0
INJURIES:
PAX: 45
CREW:x
OTHER: 0
DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT: substantial
On landing roll the right main gear collapsed causing substantial damage to the right wing structure before coming to rest (partially) beneath runway (27/09, 3300 m). Injuries occured during emegency evacuation. The 737 was chartered by spanish families who host West Saharian children refugees in algerian camps for holidays in their home. Seville airport´s single runway was blocked for hours to ensure rescue operations.>>