'The Day Britain Stood Still'

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 2,491

Originally posted by martin_EGTK
The go around procedures at Heathrow do not direct aircraft into the path of a departure runway, this I felt was not necessary and will further heighten the publics already hyperbolic fear of flying.

If having the media do something like this, is the price we have to pay to get politicians to look seriously at ATC and aviation infrastructure, I for one don't mind paying it!

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 2,253

Originally posted by greekdude1
Does that Milenium Dome even have a purpose?

In a word, No, although it does ( or did? I can't remember if the government sold it or not) act as a very effective drain for tax payers money... :S

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 2,491

It's very interesting out of the window of a Dash 8 though!

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 2,956

That's what I thought Bhoy, thanks.

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 6,968

Originally posted by martin_EGTK
The go around procedures at Heathrow do not direct aircraft into the path of a departure runway, this I felt was not necessary and will further heighten the publics already hyperbolic fear of flying.

Martin, if you look closely you'll find that it was the BA flight which turned left into the path of the CSA aircraft on go-around. I would imagine it is fine for departing a/c to turn left, just that nobody told him that an aircraft was overflying the landing runway. One would imagine that is one of the benefits of parallel runways. There should never be a conflict between arriving and departing aircraft.

As to the programme itself I thought it was very well thought out and executed. Another rail disaster is a foregone conclusion due to the state of the rail infrastructure in the UK. It is therefore conceivable that rail staff would strike in an attempt to get safety reviewed and improved. As for the roads? I think we've probably already come a lot closer to that situation than many people realise. The snowbound cars on the M11? I've been stuck on the M6 for up to five hours before now. All it takes is for a series of accidents to block certain arterial routes and the rest will follow on naturally.

A collision over London? I can only imagine that that is all too possible given increasing traffic and controller's workloads. Does anyone know whether the mention od "Carrie's Incident" relates to a real event? If so that is a wake up call which apparently hasn't been heeded.

Regards,

kev35

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 3,538

I didn't watch it as I have my medical coming up next month and I want my blood pressure to be OK! I spoke to a friend yesterday who controls at Swanwick. She told me that there are huge concerns down there as they had heard that the air traffic portrayal was supposed to be very poor. As I didn't see it I can't really comment.

On the subject of go arounds, this is an area that always amuses me. The press would have you believe that every time an aircraft performs a go around (aka missed approach) that a major accident has just been averted! The press and the public need to understand that a go around is as worrying to me as my meal not turning up on time! Obviously it's a bit more interesting in 75 meters visibility and I have to go around after main wheel contact because I didn't see any lights (Cat 3b with a decision height, this being one stage reduced from the no decision height scenario, Cat 3b no DH, due to airfield limitations).

Somebody correctly pointed out earlier that in the UK we generally do not go for cross runway operations like the Americans and for this I am grateful. In the UK multi runway ops are completed from parallel runways. All operations into commercial UK airfields have Missed Approach Procedures established so that in the event of a go around the controller doesn't have to do any frantic controlling. For example, at MAN landing on 24R with departures on 24L the MAP is climb to 750' (if I remember rightly) then right turn heading 360. This gives instant separation from departing traffic.

Finally the culture is changing in airline thinking. In years gone by there was a dreadful bravado (which is still firmly believed to exist in some far eastern cultures) that to perform a missed approach is a sign of failure leading to high landing accident statistics in these areas. We are now (in my company) actively encouraged to execute a go around if for any reason we are not at all happy.

Regards
wys