Read the forum code of contact
By: 24th August 2004 at 16:49 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Good figures .....
By: 24th August 2004 at 17:30 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Interesting to see that the EDI-EWR service has a larger percentage.
But then, the pax number will be about the same, due to capacity obviously
By: 24th August 2004 at 18:06 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Interesting to see that the EDI-EWR service has a larger percentage.But then, the pax number will be about the same, due to capacity obviously
The figures quoted by GLAsgow are wrong...
Based on 764 x 285 seats, the July total passenger count at GLA resolved to an average load factor of 74.56%
By: 24th August 2004 at 18:13 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The figures quoted by GLAsgow are wrong...Based on 764 x 285 seats, the July total passenger count at GLA resolved to an average load factor of 74.56%
I wonder if the other figures are correct then?
Care to show us tour source GLAsgow?
By: 24th August 2004 at 18:32 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The figures quoted by GLAsgow are wrong...Based on 764 x 285 seats, the July total passenger count at GLA resolved to an average load factor of 74.56%
Continental say their 767-400s have 235 seats (35 in First and 200 in Economy) and not 285.
Since it's their own aircraft that they're talking about I'm quite happy to take their word for it - but perhaps some of you feel you know better? :rolleyes:
The 777s have 283 seats (48 in First and 235 in Economy) so maybe Silver Snapper is thinking of them?
By: 24th August 2004 at 18:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-CAA website, look for yourself they are ALL correctJust a predictable responce from Silver Snapper
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:11 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I think that the seating diagrams that Matthew has posted refer to specific configurations for aircraft assigned long-term to the Micronesia services.
Continental used to do a similar thing with their DC10s.
As you can see, Continental's "mainline" B767-400s have 235 seats.
35 First + 200 Economy = 235 seats
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I wonder if the other figures are correct then?Care to show us tour source GLAsgow?
EK was 80.14%
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-[QUOTE=Grey Area]Continental say their 767-400s have 235 seats (35 in First and 200 in Economy) and not 285.
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Can those be right. There are a lot of losses on a lot of european destinations from GLA.
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:48 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Going by those stats
Growth percentages:
Traffic Movements for GLA Up 2%
Traffic Movement for EDI Up 5%
Passenger movements for GLA Up 3.5%
Passenger movements for EDI Up 7%...
Edi is expanding double the rate! :eek:
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:52 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Can those be right. There are a lot of losses on a lot of european destinations from GLA.
July isn't a good month to judge any GLA services.
It's ultra-peak, the traditional holiday season, we will have a better idea how all Scottish services are performing come
off-holiday peaks..
By: 24th August 2004 at 19:54 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Why do all EDI spotter they to turn EVERYTHING into a GLA Vs EDI match? Its just pathetic realy.
For GLA
Passengers (ooo's) 1007.4 Change on July '03 +9.9%
Air Transport Movements 9083 Change on July '03b +4.5%
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:10 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Why do all EDI spotter they to turn EVERYTHING into a GLA Vs EDI match? Its just pathetic realy.For GLA
Passengers (ooo's) 1007.4 Change on July '03 +9.9%
Air Transport Movements 9083 Change on July '03b +4.5%
Now now, no one is turning this into anything.
Pax movement change from July last year for EDI is 10.2%
Movement is up by 7.8%
not bad for a "unappealing" airport as BAA are so eager to put it.
Its good to see all airports doing well, especially after 9/11.
Dundee unfortunately is at -18.4% for traffic but up 5.6% for pax.
Aberdeen has a traffic growth of 0.4% and pax of 0.9%. Not so good.
But romping it in first place
Prestwick! Traffic up 18.2% and Pax a staggering 33.5%
That makes the Growth league table
Prestwick
EDI
GLA
Dundee
Aberdeen
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:19 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-July isn't a good month to judge any GLA services.It's ultra-peak, the traditional holiday season, we will have a better idea how all Scottish services are performing come
off-holiday peaks..
true, true.
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I think we should wait for the year total figures.
I have a sneaky feeling Prestwick might put all the airports to shame.
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:22 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Percentages are always misleading when it comes to passenger growth.
For example:
Blagways flew 100 passengers from Here to There last June, and flew 200 this June, they can rightly claim to have experienced 100% growth.
However, Grot Airways flew 1000 passenger from Here to There last June and 1400 this June but can only claim 40% growth over the same period.
Even though Grot Airways' growth alone was twice Blagways' total loading over the same period, in sheer percentage terms Blagways appears to be the far more successful of the two.
Just goes to show what they say about lies, damned lies and statistics. :D
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:26 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Percentages are always misleading when it comes to passenger growth.For example:
Blagways flew 100 passengers from Here to There last June, and flew 200 this June, they can rightly claim to have experienced 100% growth.
However, Grot Airways flew 1000 passenger from Here to There last June and 1400 this June but can only claim 40% growth over the same period.
Even though Grot Airways' growth alone was twice Blagways' total loading over the same period, in sheer percentage terms Blagways appears to be the far more successful of the two.
Just goes to show what they say about lies, damned lies and statistics. :D
Percentages also have their uses. These stats are created on averages afaik.
For general info like this thread... they'll suffice.
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:36 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The seatguru map referred to the "Hawaii" configuration.
Airlines sometimes configure the same type of aircraft with different seats, depending on the destination. BA for instance, always used to have more seats in their "Miami" 744's than the rest of the fleet.
By: 24th August 2004 at 20:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-The seatguru map referred to the "Hawaii" configuration.Airlines sometimes configure the same type of aircraft with different seats, depending on the destination. BA for instance, always used to have more seats in their "Miami" 744's than the rest of the fleet.
Very true.
Another example: COA's International 757s have less seating than their Domestics. The reason being obvious
Posts: 218
By: GLAsgow - 24th August 2004 at 16:34
GLA - Newark - 13,175 pax, 90% Load Factor, averaging 192 pax per flight.
GLA - Chicago-O'Hare - 11,935 pax, 91% Load Factor, averaging 192 pax per
flight.
GLA - Philadelphia -10,750 pax, 87% Load Factor, averaging 173 pax per
flight.
GLA- Dubai - 14,168 pax, 82% Load Factor, averaginf 228 pax per flight.
GLA - Toronto - 27,884 pax, 900 pax per day passing through Glasgow
International to/from Toronto.
GLA-SFB JULY 2004 JULY 2003 %Change
26527 12860 106