By: J Boyle
- 16th March 2016 at 14:04Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
After a brief look, I'd recommend longer landing gear legs. Less stress and damage to the fuselage and greater clearance for the prop.
It stands to reason that many interested in a very low cost aircraft will be new pilots.
An inexpensive aircraft won't be inexpensive for long if it is too easily damaged.
By: topspeed
- 17th March 2016 at 05:38Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
After a brief look, I'd recommend longer landing gear legs. Less stress and damage to the fuselage and greater clearance for the prop.
It stands to reason that many interested in a very low cost aircraft will be new pilots.
An inexpensive aircraft won't be inexpensive for long if it is too easily damaged.
Thanks Boyle. I will look after that stress factor on LG....and the geometry.
Posts: 9,821
By: J Boyle - 16th March 2016 at 14:04 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
After a brief look, I'd recommend longer landing gear legs. Less stress and damage to the fuselage and greater clearance for the prop.
It stands to reason that many interested in a very low cost aircraft will be new pilots.
An inexpensive aircraft won't be inexpensive for long if it is too easily damaged.
Posts: 2,619
By: topspeed - 17th March 2016 at 05:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Thanks Boyle. I will look after that stress factor on LG....and the geometry.
Posts: 2,619
By: topspeed - 31st March 2016 at 06:30 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Boyle hello !
How about now ?
Does anyone get kicks outa this ?
Posts: 2,619
By: topspeed - 17th April 2016 at 05:30 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Structural ideas.