Science Museum, London with a Sony A7s

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

19 years 1 month

Posts: 2,656

Nothing that hasn't been seen before but as my Sony A7s (s = 'special' as in taking photos at very high ISO numbers with nil to minimum digital noise) Compact Systems Camera finally arrived, I was itching to try it out before the dark, frosty, moonlit winter nights arrived. With it's dark blue painted ceiling, the aeroplane gallery in the Science Museum was a natural choice to try out a camera that shoots in the dark. If it can cope with that colour, it can cope with anything. The Auto Focus on the A7 & A7s is a bit pedestrian compared to that on the Sony Alpha SLT but as I'm not using them for 'action' shots, that's not a problem. A plus point on the A7s is a silent shutter. You can stand in the middle of a crowd and no one knows you are taking photographs. The photos are all hand held (tripods are not allowed in the Science Museum), in the order they were taken in Extra Fine Jpeg and with a view to the lighting conditions rather than the exhibits on show.

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/01.jpg~original
ISO 3,200-f6.3-1/13sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/02.jpg~original
ISO 4,000-f7.1-1/10sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/03.jpg~original
ISO 5,000-f7.1-1/13sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/04.jpg~original
ISO 16,000-f5-1/30sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/05.jpg~original
ISO 6,400-f5-1/10sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/06.jpg~original
ISO 6,400-f5.6-1/8sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/07.jpg~original
ISO 5,000-f5-1/6sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/08.jpg~original
ISO 5,000-f7.1-1/15sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/09.jpg~original
ISO 3,200-f6.3-1/3sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/10.jpg~original
ISO 3,200-f7.1-1/5sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/11.jpg~original
ISO 3,200-f7.1-1/6sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/12.jpg~original
ISO 6,400-f8-1/15sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/13.jpg~original
ISO 6,400-f8-1/15sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/14.jpg~original
ISO 4,000-f5-1/6sec

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/12%20Miscellaneous%202014/11%20Science%20Museum%2026Aug14/15.jpg~original
ISO 4,000-f5.6-1/15sec

Brian

Original post

Member for

12 years 5 months

Posts: 310

Great pictures Brian, whatever you are using! Thanks for posting, haven't been there for about 50 years.
Regards
Bill

Member for

24 years 3 months

Posts: 2,835

Beautiful pics. You can be my photographer any day

Member for

11 years 5 months

Posts: 407

The place looks deserted.

Member for

16 years 3 months

Posts: 1,813

I didn't understand any of the technical dissertation on cameras but the "pics" of some great aircraft were good.....

Member for

21 years 1 month

Posts: 1,746

Excellent pictures Brian. I know it's the Science museum but haveing some airframes completely 'bare'
is strange. Part covered, part exposed is more informative.
mmitch.

Member for

14 years 11 months

Posts: 556

When it comes to cameras anything beyond "put film here" goes right over my head. That said, some great pictures. Thanks for sharing. JT

Member for

13 years 11 months

Posts: 379

What I first found quite astonishing is the very clear and detailed background (hangar roof or wall). It seems to me those details quite far away are much sharper as in pics taken with other cameras, or is it just my imagination? The range of detailed objects seems to be really great.

Michael

Member for

19 years 1 month

Posts: 2,656

Michael

Without putting on my anorak and boring people :D it has something to do with the smaller 12mp sensor size which apparently means it has larger sized 'pixels' on the sensor which can take in more light and information. According to the reviews ISO 6,400 on the A7s is the about equivalent of ISO 1,600 on other full frame cameras and you can go up to 12,800 before 'digital noise' starts putting in an appearance and then you really have to look for it. As I said they were taken in Jpeg and would probably be better in RAW. The A7s is also being marketed as a 4K (no idea what that means) video camera rather than a stills camera.

Brian

Member for

20 years 3 months

Posts: 778

Brian, have you tried it at Hendon yet?

Member for

19 years 1 month

Posts: 2,656

Not yet as I recently had a visit with the Sony A7

Brian

Member for

24 years 3 months

Posts: 3,566

The A7s is also being marketed as a 4K (no idea what that means) video camera rather than a stills camera.

It's Ultra High Def video format...

Member for

19 years 7 months

Posts: 1,566

Lovely photos - that is an impressive camera. A small question if I may, what is the first pic of?

Member for

24 years 3 months

Posts: 16,832

It's the gondola from Airship Beta II, 17

Moggy

Member for

4 years 1 month

Posts: 1

Fantastic post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Kudos!

Member for

16 years 8 months

Posts: 5,927

It appears that this forum is becoming an open house with no obvious policing. How long will it be before the fake viagra and the Nigerian scamming advertisements start to appear?

Member for

18 years 1 month

Posts: 2,115

Key: if, as you have said so often, you actually follow these threads, why do you let this spam thrive? Some of us remain faithful to this forum, so please look after us. Also, please acknowledge this post.

Laurence

Member for

16 years 8 months

Posts: 5,927

I suspect, Laurence, that Key Publishing only looks at the list of thread titles, rather than the posts within the threads, which may explain why the 'feed me children' thread disappeared but 'pirate' posts on this thread remain - which probably will also go to explain why, if it proves to be the case,  you don't get the acknowledgement that you've requested of Key Publishing!

Member for

19 years 5 months

Posts: 9,823

But as someone recently pointed out in one of the other threads...the moderating on the old, good, forum could be heavy handed.

I'm thinking of a particular mod who thought he was God, forcing his opinions on all and insulting anyone he disagreed with...

Anyway, if you want a good forum on this sibject, try WIX, even if it is...well...gasp...American!

Member for

16 years 8 months

Posts: 5,927

..... point taken, but it worked and the forum thrived - which is more than can be said of today!

Member for

11 years 4 months

Posts: 1,299

We should soon find out if you're right in suspecting Key only look at the thread titles, AA. The "feed me children" post now appears within the Service Updates thread! Posted yesterday morning.