Amelia Earharts Electra found. No, not by you know who...

Member for

16 years 1 month

Posts: 222

Amelia Earharts Electra found. Perhaps...!

Original post

Member for

13 years 2 months

Posts: 9,690

Bill Snavely, who has spent 13 years studying the site, is raising funds to make a film and fund more expeditions to the area

I would say that the piece of glass is not the only thing that 'shares some consistencies' with something else connected to Amelia Earhart!

Profile picture for user Nachtjagd

Member for

10 years 6 months

Posts: 249

Well they seem to have found more than the other lot!

Profile picture for user Wellington285

Member for

11 years 7 months

Posts: 416

The cockpit photo confirms an aircraft. Could it be a Ventura that is known to have crashed near Buka Island, as mentioned by a member on the PPRUNE website.
Ian

Profile picture for user Beermat

Member for

10 years 1 month

Posts: 3,439

Hi all - I can't find the cockpit photograph, where is it?

Profile picture for user J Boyle

Member for

15 years 1 month

Posts: 9,664

I wouldn't get too excited yet. There were a lot of Lockheeds in the area including Japanese aircraft built under license.

It would be great if it was her aircraft, just to see the reaction of a certain group.

Member for

1 year 11 months

Posts: 167

As J Boyle said, I can't work up any enthusiasm for this yet. There are far too many loose ends that haven't even been looked at to make a flatly declarative statement that it's Earhart's aircraft. The USN lost at least one PV-1 Ventura in the area; the Japanese had their own and license-built copies of several twin-tailed Lockheed products, and we don't know how many of those may have been lost in that area (the Buka area had numerous Japanese air bases).

The US used a variety of Lockheed twin-tailed craft, including the PV-1 Ventura, PV-2 Harpoon, Hudson, and C-56 Lodestar; there was also the Beech C-45 Expediter. The wreck could be an Australian Hudson or other Lend-Lease twin-tailed Lockheed provided to that ally.

Then there is the small matter of whether Earhart would have had enough gas left to double back that far, after almost making it to Howland Island.

But, as TIGHAR has amply demonstrated, all you need is a "preponderance of evidence" to declare something solved beyond a reasonable doubt.This group says all they need is $200,000 - pocket change compared to the millions of dollars TIGHAR has spent to find, well, nothing.

Profile picture for user Beermat

Member for

10 years 1 month

Posts: 3,439

Don't get me wrong, In trying to understand what the unusual thing I am looking at here actually is does not mean I am excited about it being that particular aeroplane. In fact I have never understood why it has obsessed so many people more than any other aviation accident.. They messed up, many people have. I am interested to find out what those divers actually found - it's an intriguing image.

Profile picture for user Consul

Member for

15 years 3 months

Posts: 1,774

Beermat surely there are far more folk obsessed about finding that answer to the MH370 accident than have ever expressed an interesting in resolving this Earhart mystery?

Profile picture for user J Boyle

Member for

15 years 1 month

Posts: 9,664

MFowler...
Did you really mean the USAAF lost a PV-1?
As you know, the Ventura was a Navy aircraft...with a Navy designation (Patrol Vega).

Member for

15 years 3 months

Posts: 1,566

Well as someone has asked elsewhere regarding the wreck then run a tape measure over it. That'll confirm whether it's a Lockheed 10 or instead one of its larger descendants. I can't understand why they didn't do that in the first place. No need for $200,000 that could have done easily on the first dive seeing as how the wreck was being investigated to see if it was Earhart's Electra. That's the problem with most of these claims, they all seem to be more interested in the media 15 seconds of fame rather than the solution to the puzzle.

Profile picture for user Beermat

Member for

10 years 1 month

Posts: 3,439

Yes, I expect you're right, Consul. But you surely get my point, it's no more a 'mystery' than any other lost aircraft, it's just an echo of celebrity - sufficient to make money for some people. For me the interest is more 'what's that thing they have found' that 'where exactly did an Electra fall into the Pacific', even though it would be an even more interesting answer if it were that thing. Particularly as it would be fun to see the reaction of Tighar-donors.

I have just held my nose and read the Daily Mail article, and wished hadn't - it actually quotes Gillespie, who talks of the various people, mostly housewives, in the US who claimed to have received signals from the 300-mile range HF set on board on their domestic radios. My favourite part is the 'artists impression' of an Electra standing on its undercarriage having landed on a submerged coral reef. I am starting to wonder whether the same 'artist' did the pristine panel under the coral.

Digging into the issue of the range of the sets on board, the internet seems full of Gillespie, with sites like the 'Tech Times' talking of the Electra 'disappearing from radars' (quite a trick mid-Pacific in 1937) and how all the reported transmissions (High level harmonics 'heard' by housewives in Florida and Texas when they 'just happened to turn their sets on at the right time') had been somehow 'traced' to Gardner Island.

The Mail had to resort to this kind of hokum actually put out by a different theorist to fill up this new story (minus the 'traced back to Gardner', of course). All we really have is a blobby coral formation that's the wreck of something. By the project's own admission it's a debris trail, so measuring it won't help much. And a dish that could be part of a landing light. Or a dinner service. That no attempt has been apparently yet been made (at least publicly) to compare it to an actual Electra landing light makes me doubtful.

If anyone from Blue Angel is reading this, here's a useful link:
https://www.letadlanaplatne.cz/en/fi...-l-10-electra/

..they have one with the original 10E lights. There may even be one or two closer to home. Yes, I am being a tad ironic and cynical, it's a British thing.

Member for

1 year 11 months

Posts: 167

J Boyle - you are correct. Fixed! That's what I get for late night ruminations.

Member for

10 years

Posts: 1,205

Am I missing something here? The picture seems to show a diver looking into a coral hole in which there is something apparently man-made thanks to some straight lines and blocks of even colour.
How on earth can anyone be sure it's an aircraft, let alone a Lockheed Twin? A chunk of a fibreglass boat seems just as possible from the photo, and more likely...
Not getting excited yet!

Profile picture for user DH82EH

Member for

6 years 11 months

Posts: 541

I can only imagine how keen people will be to part with their hard earned, to pay for other peoples tropical vacations, after the likes of that other bozo fleeced people for millions.

Profile picture for user J Boyle

Member for

15 years 1 month

Posts: 9,664

But many the people who were "fleeced" don't seem to mind.
There are still a lot of believers out there.

Profile picture for user ZRX61

Member for

14 years 6 months

Posts: 4,796

The only fact we have so far: This water appears to be just as wet as it was back when Amelia went AWOL: Absent, without leads ;)

Profile picture for user adrian_gray

Member for

19 years 11 months

Posts: 2,964

If TIGHAR would just ask me I'd be happy to sell them a relic that MIGHT have belonged to Earhart, a snip at half a million nicker, what say you?

Art-deco Kodak Duo-620 by gray1720, on Flickr

(it works, too - it seemes appropriate to take it round some airfields so here's Hatston, Skaebrae, and Twatt - let's see if the software stars that out!)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gray1720/albums/72157646839526613

Adrian

Member for

5 years 2 months

Posts: 74

It's not a landing light glass, it's an empty skin cream jar.

Member for

1 year 11 months

Posts: 167

I think the alleged freckle cream jar is emblematic of TIGHAR's entire Earhart effort to date - it MUST be a freckle cream jar, because Earhart WAS on Nikumaroro Island, and Earhart DID dislike her freckles. End of discussion.

There's a phrase for this kind of logic but decorum prevents me from posting it in polite company.