Finest piston engine of WW2 era?

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

18 years 3 months

Posts: 151

What was the finest piston engne of WW2 era?
If we break it down between liquid cooled and radial.

Top radial the Centaurus?
What about something a bit more unusual like the HA-45. It was very small, direct injected. Also, unreliable but that may not have been so much due to design but to production problems.
Just go with the R2800? It was bullet proof. Litteraly in some cases.

Liquid cooled, Griffen? Merlin? DB600 series?

suspect it would have pulled it apart but a Centaurus radial in the nose of a KI-84...now that would have been something.

Original post

Member for

18 years

Posts: 38

You've really started something here!! :)

From a complexity and sheer ingenuity of design point of view my choice would be the Bristol Centaurus, Napier Sabre, or Rolls-Royce Vulture X....

But for classic engineering excellence and longevity of type and developement it would have to be the Merlin...nothing else sounds like it or evokes such a response from the public as a whole...the Griffon is a fine engine but always sounds like it it has a couple of plugs fouled!

Sorry if I've upset anyone... these are only my humble opinions! ;)

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 1,537

But for classic engineering excellence and longevity of type and developement it would have to be the Merlin...nothing else sounds like it or evokes such a response from the public as a whole...the Griffon is a fine engine but always sounds like it it has a couple of plugs fouled!

I agree with Dave.

Well, maybe not quite about the Griffon though! :)

For pure longevity and development, the Merlin has to be the engine that takes this award for me.

And what a sound! :D

Like the Spitfire, it always amazed me how Rolls kept on developing it and developing it, attempting to get the maximum performance from it, and also coming up with variants that would suit one particular role or another.

Remarkable!

I guess there is a lot of truth when people say that the Spitfire without the Merlin would have been like Laurel without Hardy!

I guess also the P&W R2800 maybe a contender for this title too. Again, a magnificent engine and developed in many models and power ratings that powered a many of American greatest Fighters.

Cheers

Paul

Member for

20 years

Posts: 307

Piston engines of WW2

If it wasn't for the Gipsy........

HP

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 1,537

A forgotten gem?

If it wasn't for the Gipsy........

HP

How true.

But whenever WWII comes up, I tend to think of big noisey piston engines that powered fighters & bombers! :o

Cheers

Paul

Member for

18 years 10 months

Posts: 2,757

Have to agree with Hairyplane, the Gipsy makes any aircraft powered by it beautiful (Tiger Moth, Auster I and III, Messenger, Magister, need I go on!)

Member for

18 years 8 months

Posts: 358

Lets see now.

Liquid cooled;
For development potential, does anything beat the Merlin? Clean sheet start with 27 litres and 1000 Hp. Finish with 27 litres and 2000 Hp. Hmm, not bad. Almost broke the company. But so did the Vulture. The RB211 did but that is another story.

For liniage, Start with 37 litres as the Buzzard, get developed into the 37 litre Schnieder (sure I spelt it wrong again) Trophy winning 'R', get further developed into the 37 litre Griffon (test run before the Merlin), and serve with Her Majesty's RAF in front line service until 1991, continue to serve with the RAF up to the present day. That makes about 80 years. Hmm, not bad.

Both pretty fine.

Air cooled;
American - Continental, Lycoming, Wright and Pratt and Whitney all built fine radial engines. Wouldn't like to say which was the finest.
British - long list of the finest ever built. Wouldn't like to say which was the finest.
Russian - as per British.
Japanese - as per British

I think this is one issue that could only be settled by those airmen who trusted their lives behind these engines. Then again, chances of general agreement...

Member for

20 years 4 months

Posts: 1,278

Please....open and shut for me...Rolls Royce Merlin inline and Pratt and Whitney R-2800 radial...SOOOO easy....but others will disagree...

M

Member for

19 years 7 months

Posts: 1,566

Real can of worms :confused: .

For me its the Merlin, Napier Sabre and Griffon for inline types. Although the DB605 was excellent. And let's face it for low level work the Allison was no slouch.

For radials its a real toss-up - Wright Cyclone, P&W R2800, BMW, Bristol Hercules, Centaurus etc. etc.

One could just go on and on :confused: - the Russian engines were all good and the Japanese Homare was pretty fine too.

Too hard to pick though - my personal favourite is the Napier Sabre but that's just a personal thing because I like the Tempest :D .

Member for

18 years 3 months

Posts: 151

were there any really unique differences between the major engines?

Radial engines:
All American radials apear the same except for displacement and number of cylinders.
The Centaurus has sleeve valves and at least one British radial series had 4 valve heads.
The Japanese HA-45 had direct injection

The inline engines all apear more or less the same. V-type (of some sort) over head cam(s) 4 Valve heads.

I'd still love to see a Centaurus hung off the front of a KI-84

Member for

19 years 10 months

Posts: 1,261

Please....open and shut for me...Rolls Royce Merlin inline and Pratt and Whitney R-2800 radial...SOOOO easy....but others will disagree...

And some will agree - you're bang on laddie

Member for

24 years 2 months

Posts: 4,169

the Griffon is a fine engine but always sounds like it it has a couple of plugs fouled!

Hello Dave,

You'd be the second person in a few days to say that about the Griffon... ;)

Member for

18 years

Posts: 93

For afficinados of engines there is an extremely good book by Victor Bingham titled "Major Piston Aero Engines of World War II". It covers some interesting German & Russian engines.

Member for

20 years 3 months

Posts: 1,452

If it wasn't for the Gipsy........

HP


I'm with HP on this one. Without the Gipsy, few of the pilots of the Merlin engined aircraft et al wouldn't have got airborne. Possibly one of the the most under-rated engines in recent times?

Member for

19 years 4 months

Posts: 1,493

I'm with HP on this one. Without the Gipsy, few of the pilots of the Merlin engined aircraft et al wouldn't have got airborne. Possibly one of the the most under-rated engines in recent times?

The Gipsy may well be a good engine, but i don't think it would have stopped people from progressing to fly merlin engined aircraft if it hadn't been invented. And also isn't the gipsy not a pre world war two engine. So merlin it is for me.

Member for

19 years 7 months

Posts: 22

Any one who knows Merlins, The "Packard built Rolls-Royce Merlin" 1650-7 for performance and reliability.

Member for

20 years 8 months

Posts: 474

...the Griffon is a fine engine but always sounds like it it has a couple of plugs fouled!

That is because it uses a different firing order to the Merlin. And its not because it rotates in the opposite direction either. And if my memory serves me correctly it has some quite aggressive settings for timing and valve overlap. Combine this with lower rpm settings and the sound is very different. Its a bit meatier in my opinion.

By the way, although I admire the Sabre and Centaurus, not to mention the Jumo 213, BMW801 and R3350, by any measures you wish to use 2 engines stand head and shoulders above everything else, yes, the Merlin and the R2800. I find it impossible to chose between them as to which was the best.

Member for

18 years

Posts: 38

Hello Dave,

You'd be the second person in a few days to say that about the Griffon... ;)

Hi! Yeah, I know! :o

Member for

18 years 8 months

Posts: 51

Bristol Centaurus is pretty good contender and the Napier Sabre is proof of the evolution of wartime development thinking even if towards the end of the war you wernt checking your six as much as your engine instruments.

Wasnt the griffon an earlier design than the merlin? - if so, for the underdog to overtake the merlin makes it a contender? -

Ultimately if the context is 'wartime' engines and not just piston engines the merlin has to win doesnt it?

Having said that if the Griffon was earlier, it spawned the Merlin then Superceded it right up to the good ole shackelton. (my facts could be wrong).

My money is on the Griffon - and youve got to thank it for the way it improved the look of the spitfire, without it would we have had the distinctive look of the later mark spitfires - (and less to argue over!)