Was the F-15 the best choice for Japan?

Profile picture for user J-20

Member for

1 year 8 months

Posts: 163

it seems the Tornado, F-14 and F-18 competed for it in the 80s. In retrospect was the F-15 the best choice among these 4? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPow4DOVAAAS3FB.jpg https://blog-imgs-37-origin.fc2.com/g/h/o/ghosteye/FA18EJ_block2_02.jpg
Original post

Member for

4 years

Posts: 125

Yes. All those other airplanes have either been retired or in the process of being replaced. the F-15 will soldier on for some time. Granted, I don't think their F-15s is as well suited for maritime strike as some of the other choices, but I believe Japan already had dedicated maritime strikers. F-14 and the Tornado probably would have been more expensive to operate

Member for

1 year 9 months

Posts: 549

I would say, "yes". They have no carrier, so the other two seem pointless. Very interested in this F-22/35 hybrid they've been offered though.
Profile picture for user Freehand

Member for

7 years 5 months

Posts: 980

Totally. The JASDF became the largest operator of the type outside of the U.S. MHI manufactured over 150 examples. F-4/F-1 took the ground attack role that the F-15 could not fulfill. Maybe cost was the reason they chose to pursue the development of the F-2 over the idea of acquiring an "F-15EJ" derivative. From what I read, the F-2's cost went way over planned figures. The USSR was basing MiG-25s right next door at the time. When the decision to buy the F-15 was made, Lt. Belenko had yet to make his famous flight.
Profile picture for user MadRat

Member for

13 years 1 month

Posts: 4,939

The Japanese were wise to go F-15J followed by additional development. I wouldn't doubt that their stealth is a development of F-15 going on the basic layout of their demonstrator.
Profile picture for user MadRat

Member for

13 years 1 month

Posts: 4,939

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fplv2UQA0P0/V06nyfPFl3I/AAAAAAAACns/r76Pgv6Uqg45ENNNvAhkSs_EJZAmOHCYQCLcB/s1600/X-2%2B2016%2BAkira%2BUekawa.jpg https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/kahhar_786/20881907/224188/224188_original.jpg
Profile picture for user KGB

Member for

3 years 6 months

Posts: 1,168

The Japanese 5 gen tech demonstrator is so bland and boring to look at. It has shades of the Boeing X-35. It is not sleek.
Profile picture for user Al.

Member for

10 years 10 months

Posts: 1,003

Yes. Absolutely. The Japanese needed an Air Superiority Fighter. In the UK Range and altitude were primary and a lack of dogfighting ability (or de-prioritisation at the very least) was excusable* Likewise USN needed Range and altitude (and the ability to land on a carrier) so the F14's flaws and costs were bearable. For their (USN) lo end Range and AAM load out likewise excusable (they had the F14 to do that) Continental Europe dogfighting and the ability to do strike and short range air-to-air trumped range, single-engine and AAM load out so since F16 was cheaper than F15 that made sense The Canadians and Aussies needed much shorter field performance so a carrier-based design had attractions for them which pragmatically made F18 a better choice But the Japanese needed Range, AAM capacity, Two engines and dogfighting all in one airframe and they had no need for short-field performance. Nothing else Western came close to the mighty Eagle on those terms. * I imagine I'm typical of most kids growing up in the UK during the Cold War in wishing that the RAF had F15s instead of Tornado F3s, but with a bit of distance and reflection it wasn't a terrible decision. PS: I'm hoping that the Japanese Technology Demonstrator is a scaled demonstrator; if that this is stretched by another 10% it could suddenly look a lot more elegant.

Member for

8 years 5 months

Posts: 203

Maybe the F-14 would have been a better choice *if* the Japanese were willing to pay for better engines than the TF30s. But chances are that would have made it significantly more expensive than the F-15 they did buy. Tornado would have been okay but it would still suffer from mediocre performance at high altitudes. Not ideal if they ever had to try to intercept MiG-25s.
Profile picture for user Cherry Ripe

Member for

10 years 2 months

Posts: 554

I imagine I'm typical of most kids growing up in the UK during the Cold War in wishing that the RAF had F15s instead of Tornado F3s, but with a bit of distance and reflection it wasn't a terrible decision.
Well the main reason for selecting the ADV was cost; to keep the per-unit Tornado costs in line the UK had to meet its original target of 385 airframes. As early as 1976 the ADV was being described as 'satisfactory' for the role envisaged which was faint praise. An F-15B with UK radar and systems would probably have been better in every way except cost. Also around the same time AST.403 requirement emerged for a tactical high-agility successor to Jaguar and Harrier, for which the F-16 was pencilled-in. So the lack of dogfighting capability in the ADV wasn't seen as critical as it wouldn't be mixing with MiGs. Fomr the Flight archive, 1976 airframe prices listed by the UK MoD in response to Parliament queries: F-14 £10 million, F-15 £7 million, ADV £6.5 million projected. Plus additional costs for the US options in fitting UK equipment and increase in unit costs for the 220 IDS on order.
Profile picture for user J Boyle

Member for

14 years 11 months

Posts: 9,617

The range issue alone made the F-15 the best choice. Plus it's large enough to have significant growth potential in avionics and weapons fit. As far as the Tornado ADV...just ask yourself why aren't they still in use? Not a bad aircraft, just not as capable as the Eagle (but quite a bit noisier if my experience with other Tornadoes is accurate).
Profile picture for user TOMCAT TERRITORY

Member for

14 years 11 months

Posts: 65

Was the F-15 the best choice for Japan? Short answer - no.
Profile picture for user Cherry Ripe

Member for

10 years 2 months

Posts: 554

Japan had another look at the F-15 in the mid-1980s as a basis for FS-X but went with the F-16 purely on cost grounds. Other than price the only practical downside they identified for the F-15 was its lack of stealth potential ( yes they used that term even in 1985 ) and since the F-16 met the requirements and was also non-stealthy they went with the smaller airframe.
Profile picture for user haavarla

Member for

10 years 10 months

Posts: 6,437

Meh.. Japan should just bite the bullet and order up a F-15SE 2.0 version. There is no need to suck their treasures dry with a new insanly costly fighter program. Atleast new F-15's could happen quickly enough.
Profile picture for user MadRat

Member for

13 years 1 month

Posts: 4,939

Stealth technology was basically revealed in 1984-ish when the F-20A program caused troubles flying in civilian airspace without the transponder on. Northrop advertised it as an asset.
Profile picture for user SpudmanWP

Member for

10 years 9 months

Posts: 5,196

What "Stealth technology" did the F-20A have?
Profile picture for user Sintra

Member for

12 years 1 month

Posts: 3,765

What "Stealth technology" did the F-20A have?
Almost certainly none
Profile picture for user SpudmanWP

Member for

10 years 9 months

Posts: 5,196

Almost certainly none
Sales? :very_drunk:
Profile picture for user Privateer454

Member for

9 years 1 month

Posts: 101

Something smells about this F-22/F-35 hybrid idea. It is hard to believe that the USG would ok the sale of an a/c that has technology based on the F-22 that was never cleared for FMS. Not to mention the cost of said aircraft would be dramatically greater than just re-opening the F-22 line, and we have all heard repeatedly that this is too expensive. Which begs the question, if a FMS based on F-22 tech is now ok, why not just have Japan help fund the cost of reopening the F-22 line and hardware updates, and drive the per airframe cost down by doing a joint US & Japan buy? Seems like a win-win that way.
Profile picture for user Mercurius

Member for

12 years 1 month

Posts: 1,347

In the early 1980s I had a long briefing on the F-20 on behalf of a client. The aircraft had no RCS-reduction features.
Profile picture for user SpudmanWP

Member for

10 years 9 months

Posts: 5,196

It is hard to believe that the USG would ok the sale....
Most of the items that held the F-22 back were avionics in nature. If you threw all the F-35 avionics at the new plane then this would not be an issue.