Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again)

Profile picture for user roberto_yeager

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 946

Well, I think that the previos Thread it´s lost... so, I open a new again... And there is a philippinean Bo-105 http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/6334/philipbo105ee8.th.jpghttp://img236.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif 1Saludo
Original post
Profile picture for user WP840

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 1,953

I think it is fair to say this is the aircraft that has carried the most impressive weapons load...!
Attachment Size
Enola Gay.jpg 300.11 KB

Member for

12 years 5 months

Posts: 158

Lebanese Huey with impressive load! http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/vmitil/LebAFhueybomber2.jpg
Profile picture for user roberto_yeager

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 946

:eek::eek: I love that Huey!!!! 1Saludo

Member for

14 years 1 month

Posts: 84

Is it really safe to hang a bomb like that under the Huey's center line?

Member for

11 years 1 month

Posts: 24

I'm thinking the hardpoint could be crushed into / through the floor in the event of a hard landing with the bomb still attached. There's seems to be practically zero ground clearance! :( One would hope the bomb at least has a safety that would prevent it from detonating while still on the rack. :eek: For impressive looking weapons load I think you can't really beat a "Loaded for Bear" Skyraider - particularly in the Sandy role in Vietnam. In second place the A10 Warthog.
Profile picture for user flex297

Member for

16 years 2 months

Posts: 10,217

I think it is fair to say this is the aircraft that has carried the most impressive weapons load...!
Dropped in combat yes.. Carried no. By far the most impressive ordnance carrier so far was a Tu-95 with TSAR hydrogen bomb.
Profile picture for user sferrin

Member for

14 years 6 months

Posts: 9,683

Dropped in combat yes.. Carried no. By far the most impressive ordnance carrier so far was a Tu-95 with TSAR hydrogen bomb.
Or a B-36 with a pair of Mk 17/24s. Or with a pair of 44,000lb T-12 (conventional bombs). I suppose it could have carried 6 or 7 25Mt Mk41s but I don't recall if the service dates overlapped. I wonder how much range and speed a Bear would have carrying a bomb that wouldn't even fit in it.
Profile picture for user roberto_yeager

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 946

F-111
Attachment Size
r1.JPG 59.29 KB
Profile picture for user kfeltenberger

Member for

12 years 6 months

Posts: 202

About the Harrier 1Saludo
The picture with the rocket pods got me to wondering why it seems that rocket pods tend to be used more by European air arms than the US (Navy, Marines, and AF)? Is there a reason why one would favor mostly rockets over mostly bombs, or is it more a doctrinal issue?
Profile picture for user roberto_yeager

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 946

More hawk... 1Saludo
Attachment Size
Zimbabawe BAe Hawk.jpg 47.37 KB
Profile picture for user MadRat

Member for

13 years 2 months

Posts: 4,943

I wonder if the Hawk 200 will ever be qualified to carry Meteor.
Profile picture for user WP840

Member for

13 years 8 months

Posts: 1,953

Or a B-36 with a pair of Mk 17/24s. Or with a pair of 44,000lb T-12 (conventional bombs). I suppose it could have carried 6 or 7 25Mt Mk41s but I don't recall if the service dates overlapped. I wonder how much range and speed a Bear would have carrying a bomb that wouldn't even fit in it.
What is the heaviest bomb load ever carried by an aircraft into combat?

Member for

14 years 11 months

Posts: 1,620

What is the heaviest bomb load ever carried by an aircraft into combat?
I would imagine it to be the B-52 in Vietnam at around 30 tons, although I stand under correction.
Profile picture for user Arthur

Member for

19 years 10 months

Posts: 7,877

The picture with the rocket pods got me to wondering why it seems that rocket pods tend to be used more by European air arms than the US (Navy, Marines, and AF)? Is there a reason why one would favor mostly rockets over mostly bombs, or is it more a doctrinal issue?
Rocket pods were mostly dropped in the early 1980s. Just like on your side of the pond.