By: bring_it_on
- 17th July 2014 at 21:23Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Japan, Britain To Launch Joint Missile Research
Japan said Thursday it would join forces with Britain to jointly develop missile technology for fighter jets, while also moving to export Japanese-made parts for US surface-to-air missiles.
The joint research with Britain was linked to a European missile project called Meteor, with an initial emphasis on how current Japanese technology could enhance British-developed missiles, according to a statement jointly issued by several ministries, including Japan’s foreign and defense ministries.
By: swerve
- 17th July 2014 at 21:48Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Presumably the "initial emphasis on how current Japanese technology could enhance British-developed missiles" relates to Japanese AESA missile seeker technology.
By: bring_it_on
- 18th July 2014 at 02:20Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Would be interesting to hear details of this. Would the UK meteors then be different form the other operators or would this technology find its way into the next version of the baseline meteor. I also think that getting Japanese technology in the missile, especially pertaining to the seeker is going to be the first step in adapting the missile for the Japanese F-35's. Raytheon should be worried :)
By: swerve
- 26th July 2014 at 23:03Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Presumably the "initial emphasis on how current Japanese technology could enhance British-developed missiles" relates to Japanese AESA missile seeker technology.
Bingo!
Officials at the Japanese Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) told IHS Jane's on 18 July that Mitsubishi Electric and European missile house MBDA will conduct a joint project to research whether Mitsubishi Electric's missile seeker technology could enhance the accuracy of MBDA's Meteor beyond visual range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) for use on the F-35.
By: swerve
- 30th July 2014 at 19:37Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
The Marte ER doesn't fix the shortcomings of the original.
The range is more than twice that of the upgraded longer-range Penguin Mk 3, three times that of the original Penguin, & four times that of the original Marte. It's smaller & lighter than the NSM.
New
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher
- 31st July 2014 at 05:00Permalink- Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Not sure what this means..there were many images of the Harpoons on P-8Is during flight tests..not sure if those were simply carriage trials and if integration wasn't completed as yet.
Not sure what this means..there were many images of the Harpoons on P-8Is during flight tests..not sure if those were simply carriage trials and if integration wasn't completed as yet.
Do Indian Harpoons have the target recognition and re-attack capabilities of the Block 1G?
Not sure what this means..there were many images of the Harpoons on P-8Is during flight tests..not sure if those were simply carriage trials and if integration wasn't completed as yet.
Posts: 12,109
By: bring_it_on - 17th July 2014 at 21:23 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Japan, Britain To Launch Joint Missile Research
http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140717/DEFREG03/307170036?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Seems Japan is interested in the Meteor. F-35 integration could be funded by them.
Posts: 13,433
By: swerve - 17th July 2014 at 21:48 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Presumably the "initial emphasis on how current Japanese technology could enhance British-developed missiles" relates to Japanese AESA missile seeker technology.
Posts: 12,109
By: bring_it_on - 18th July 2014 at 02:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Would be interesting to hear details of this. Would the UK meteors then be different form the other operators or would this technology find its way into the next version of the baseline meteor. I also think that getting Japanese technology in the missile, especially pertaining to the seeker is going to be the first step in adapting the missile for the Japanese F-35's. Raytheon should be worried :)
Posts: 25,376
By: Tango III - 21st July 2014 at 10:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
FARNBOROUGH: BAE bullish about APKWS purchase for US Army
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher - 24th July 2014 at 09:43 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Japan approves Meteor research JV between MBDA and Mitsubishi
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher - 24th July 2014 at 10:14 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Australia seeks participation in Kongsberg JSM missile program
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher - 24th July 2014 at 12:31 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
MBDA looking to secure launch customer for Marte-ER anti-ship missile
Posts: 4,951
By: MadRat - 25th July 2014 at 04:20 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
I never understand the need for Marte when the Penguin did the job and didn't look like a phallic toy.
Penguin looks much more serious.
Posts: 578
By: Mountain - 25th July 2014 at 11:55 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
I will take the Marte ER. At almost twice the range of the Pengiun I know what would keep me safer at launch phase.
Posts: 13,433
By: swerve - 26th July 2014 at 23:03 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Bingo!
See Black Archer's post 46.
Posts: 25,376
By: Tango III - 28th July 2014 at 10:24 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Customs: Missile parts confirmed en route to maintenance
Posts: 25,376
By: Tango III - 28th July 2014 at 10:25 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
A Syrian Rebel Advance Off the Battlefield: A Longer-Lasting Battery for Missiles
Posts: 4,951
By: MadRat - 30th July 2014 at 06:19 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Well in that case the ER is outclassed by the others in its projected weight class. The Marte ER doesn't fix the shortcomings of the original.
Posts: 25,376
By: Tango III - 30th July 2014 at 14:38 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
N. Korea may be closer to full ICBM test: US think-tank
Posts: 13,433
By: swerve - 30th July 2014 at 19:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
The range is more than twice that of the upgraded longer-range Penguin Mk 3, three times that of the original Penguin, & four times that of the original Marte. It's smaller & lighter than the NSM.
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher - 31st July 2014 at 05:00 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
UK casts doubt on Harpoon AShM future beyond 2018
Posts: 3,337
By: BlackArcher - 31st July 2014 at 05:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Australia pushes for Harpoon integration on P-8A
Not sure what this means..there were many images of the Harpoons on P-8Is during flight tests..not sure if those were simply carriage trials and if integration wasn't completed as yet.
Posts: 5,395
By: djcross - 31st July 2014 at 14:56 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Do Indian Harpoons have the target recognition and re-attack capabilities of the Block 1G?
Posts: 12,109
By: bring_it_on - 31st July 2014 at 17:00 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
http://www.navair.navy.mil/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.NAVAIRNewsStory&id=5411
Posts: 25,376
By: Tango III - 3rd August 2014 at 18:09 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
China confirms new generation long range missiles: report