Read the forum code of contact
By: 31st October 2000 at 20:51 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
The only details confirmed are that there were 179 people on board. SQ spokesmen in Taipei say 84 injured and 47 dead while 48 are unaccounted for. SQ spokeman in LA, however, report 49 deaths and 69 injuries.
I've heard reports that all three of the flight crew are among the injured.
I'm surprised at the mention of 'three', as, for the -400, there should only be two members of flight crew.
It apears to me that the Captain made the wrong decison in deciding to take off, with gusts of up to 160km/h (90mph) reported.
:'(
By: 1st November 2000 at 00:01 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
I don't know about windshear, the captain reports hitting something on the runway, this is starting to sound like concorde...
By: 1st November 2000 at 10:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
ok, 78 confirmed dead, with 85 injured, and 16 uninjured.
well, it could have been worse.
By: 1st November 2000 at 11:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
watch this space but i guarantee that with in a few hours every one is going to be saying that they don't want to fly any more!!!! three crashes in like three days wow!!!! singapore airlines, china airlines and a Taiwanese airliner!!!!
but i hate crashes because everyairline willl or has crashed and this one was impossible to stop once the decision to take off was made i hope they don't start knocking SIA because they are the best in the world-still and always!!!any way the death toll is now 77 (at the least) dead :(
By: 1st November 2000 at 15:43 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
It was horrible when I first heard this news. SIA has never had a crash in it's 28 year old history. Only it's subsidery Silk Air had a crash in Indonasia, it was a 737. The aircraft as I have heard crashed because the runway had just been fixed and they hadent removed the things which were used and the aircraft hit one of them and crcashed(just what I have heard lately). The aircraft which crashed was a 4 year old 747 Megatop and it was in a special colour scheme also. But i am sure still the SIA'a safety record will be excellent and they will be one of the top airlines of the world. But I am very sad of this crash:(:(
By: 1st November 2000 at 19:09 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
Survivors have reported anguish and distress after knowing that their flight was going to take off while many other had been cancelled. Many pointed how horrible was the wind which even made the plane shake on the way to the runway. Definitely I go for the windsheer. Whatever the cause, object on the tarmac or windsheer this proves that even in the supposed "safe" ones the procedures aren´t as they should be. Obvioulsy I´ve lost my confidence on SQ. My grief sorrow for the victims and relatives.
By: 2nd November 2000 at 13:45 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
lost your confidence??? 82 fatallities in 28 years and you have lost you confidence in them how will you ever get around?
almost every airline in the world has crashed so how will you get around i too feel sorry for the passengers but i will never stop flying with them because they are still the best airline in the world.
By: 2nd November 2000 at 15:17 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
I know this crash was fatal but i think ur loosing up confidence on SQ TOOO SOON. 28 years one crash, not bad at all I think. U actually cant have a perfect airline. SQ is one of the best airlines of the world and U just CANT loose faith on them so fast. I mean, crashes keep happining and who is not afraid of them.
By: 3rd November 2000 at 09:54 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
latest reports say SQ accept that the A/C, 9V-SPK, was on the wrong runway. Clearance was granted for 05L, but apparently the plane was on 05R. This runway was closed, and not lit, while 05L was lit. It seems very strange to me that an experienced pilot, as to all extents the Malay Captain is, should make such a catastrophic mistake.
By: 3rd November 2000 at 15:03 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
what? not lit up and at night no pilot in the world would enter an unlit runway at night if the crash had happened in the day then i'd believe but at night noway!!!!
By: 3rd November 2000 at 16:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Singaporean Jumbo crashes in Taiwan
apparently some of the lights on 05L were damaged in an incident earlier in the day. The extent of the damage has not, however been confirmed.
Posts: 2,253
By: Bhoy - 31st October 2000 at 20:20
LAST EDITED ON 31-Oct-00 AT 08:42 PM (GMT)[p]anyone got any Ideas about how SQ006 crashed on take off from Taipei bound for LAX?